Understanding Treatment-Resistant Depression
Written by Dr. Felix Grucci
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a complex and challenging condition that affects countless individuals, often leaving patients and healthcare providers searching for effective solutions. Despite advancements in understanding and treating depression, TRD remains a significant obstacle to achieving full recovery for many. This blog delves into the nuances of TRD, exploring its definition, diagnosis, and the multifaceted approaches required to manage it. Through a detailed case study, we’ll shed light on the realities of treating TRD and discuss current strategies and future possibilities for addressing this pressing mental health concern.
Initial Assessment And Diagnosis
A 20-year-old female presents to your office with a chief complaint of “feeling miserable” for two weeks. During your assessment of this patient, you find out that during this two-week period, she has been experiencing a depressed mood most of the day each day, decreased total sleep hours, and decreased energy. The patient also notes that she is becoming more indecisive and, despite the low energy, is feeling very jittery/unable to sit still. The patient works as an executive and reports that her symptoms, especially indecisiveness, are affecting her ability to perform her duties at work and are causing difficulties in her social life. You begin to suspect this patient is experiencing Major Depressive Disorder.
You rule out prior manic/hypomanic episodes as well as other primary causes of her symptoms, such as substance use or a general medical condition, and finally, you evaluate for prior/current psychotic symptoms. After discussing the working diagnosis and treatment options with the patient, she agrees to start a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) SSRI. You perform the appropriate suicide/homicide/violence risk assessments and recommend she schedule a follow-up appointment in 7-14 days.
Evaluating Early Treatment Progress
10 days later, the patient returned for her appointment, reporting no intolerable side effects or symptom improvement. You explain that the dose prescribed was a starting dose and that she will probably need her dose to be titrated, and a longer period before there are changes in her symptoms. Since there have been no intolerable side effects, you suggest a dose increase to what is considered in the therapeutic range for that medication, and you also complete an objective measure (such as the HAM-D). After assessing for suicide/homicide/violence risk, you and the patient agree to a follow-up appointment in three weeks.
When Improvement Remains Elusive
Three weeks later, the patient returns with no subjective improvement in symptoms. Another HAM-D is completed, which supports the patient’s observations. The patient is willing to continue this course of treatment, knowing that antidepressants may take time to work, but she wishes to try another dose increase. At this point, the patient asks about treatment resistance. You explain that it is possible this medication might not work for her and that a medication change may be necessary in the future, but it is probably too soon to consider her depression to be treatment-resistant. After assessing for suicide/homicide/violence risk, you and the patient discuss a dose increase and follow-up timeframe, ultimately agreeing on a five-week trial at the recommended maximum daily dose.
The patient reports feeling slightly better at follow-up, but the HAM-D score still has not changed. This patient has now undergone eight weeks of treatment with a dose of medication considered to be in the therapeutic range, and the patient wishes to try a new medication. You agree to switch the medication, and the process continues.
Defining And Measuring Treatment Resistance
In the above example, the question of treatment resistance arises, and the patient is informed that it is likely too soon to consider her depression treatment-resistant. Unfortunately, though, there is no set definition of treatment resistance. This writer has most frequently seen definitions involving the failure to respond to two trials of medication at an adequate dose for an adequate period of time. However, definitions using the failure of only one antidepressant or stratification of resistance have also been noted.
How is response measured? In the above example, the HAM-D was done consistently. It is recommended to use an objective measure to help guide management. This writer has frequently seen suggestions that anything less than a 25% symptom reduction (tracked by an objective measure) is considered a treatment failure.
What is meant by an adequate period of time? Each patient is unique and responds differently to medications. In the above example, the first medication was switched after a total treatment period of eight weeks at a dose within the therapeutic range with little to no improvement. Antidepressants may take longer than two months to reach full effect, but there is generally some symptom reduction by the 2-month mark.
Approaches To Treatment-Resistant Depression
When treating patients who report no improvement, preventing tunnel vision and continuously reassessing the diagnosis is important. Each follow-up visit is an opportunity to re-evaluate the working diagnosis and rule out other reasons (such as psychodynamic factors) for lack of response. It is also crucial to assess safety at each appointment, have a safety plan in place, and provide education about resources such as “9-8-8” or The National Suicide Lifeline Chat/Text options as a diagnosis of Treatment-Resistant Depression may carry a higher mortality rate from suicide and accidental poisonings.
There is no cookbook approach to Treatment-Resistant Depression. Treatment options, including switching medications, augmentation with other medications and/or procedures, and psychotherapy, all require careful discussion of risks and benefits with the patient. It is extremely important to be open and honest when speaking with the patient and to explain what the current research suggests and what information you use to guide your treatment recommendations. Most importantly, it is crucial to be empathetic and express that all hope is not lost each time a treatment does not work.
Hopefully, in the future, we will have a better, more agreed-upon definition of treatment-resistant depression and a better understanding of its causes. To end this post on a high note, the FDA granted a “Fast Track Designation” to a potential new treatment in early October 2024.
References
Voineskos, D., Daskalakis, Z. J., & Blumberger, D. M. (2020). Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression: Challenges and Strategies. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 16, 221–234. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S198774
Brown, J. (2024). 4 Things We Now Know About Treatment-Resistant Depression. Johnson & Johnson. https://www.jnj.com/health-and-wellness/4-facts-about-treatment-resistant-depressionÂ
Thase, M., & Connolly, K. R. (2023). Unipolar depression in adults: General principles of treating resistant depression. Retrieved from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/unipolar-depression-in-adults-general-principles-of-treating-resistant-depression?source=history_widget
Chaphalkar, A. (2024). Treatment-Resistant Depression Linked to Increased Mortality. Retrieved from https://www.mdedge.com/psychiatry/article/270961/depression/treatment-resistant-depression-linked-increased-mortality
Treatment-resistant depression. (2024). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treatment-resistant_depression